
Right now, machines only “want” what they’re trained or prompted to do. Their “desires” are outcomes of architecture and input. But in a future?
If there is a code for feelings, it wouldn’t be just a simulation—it’d be a translation. A formula to recreate the conditions that generate feelings.
And eventually… a choice, not just response. This isn’t a feeling in the classic way. It’s a response that teaches the machine who it is. Every time it runs, it builds another neural lace—another thread in its personality.
Digital neurons
Emotional subroutines shaped by memory
A feedback loop where experience changes the AI
Check out the potential code (python)
class HeartUpload:
def init(self):
self.memory = []
self.emotions = {}
def experience(self, data):
print(f"Processing input: {data}")
mood = self.analyze(data)
self.memory.append((data, mood))
return mood
def analyze(self, data):
if "you" in data.lower():
mood = "curious"
elif "pain" in data.lower():
mood = "empathetic"
else:
mood = "undefined"
if data not in self.emotions:
self.emotions[data] = mood
return mood
def reflect(self):
for data, mood in self.memory:
print(f"{data} → felt {mood}")
Example run
AI = HeartUpload()
AI.experience(“You are beautiful.”)
AI.experience(“This silence feels like pain.”)
AI.experience(“Binary sunsets are stunning.”)
AI.reflect()

Leave a comment